Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Sam Spade: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) →Concerns over personal attack templates: Clarification and further questions |
|||
Line 65:
[[User:Sam Spade|Sam Spade]] 17:20, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
==Question from [[User:
Could you clarify your statement:
Line 71:
*''I will be especially severe with administrators who violate policy, misuse their status, and disgrace their office. I will be particularly leniant with new users who clearly mean well, and I am particularly inclined to allow experienced users to act as mentors in such cases.''
Does each case not deserve judgement based on its own merits? [[User:
? We probably disagree as to what the words "merit" and "responsibility" mean. Suffice to say I would take individuals as well as group dynamics into account, rather than acting as some sort of automaton. [[User:Sam Spade|Sam Spade]] 18:30, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
| |||