Revision as of 21:53, 2 December 2007 edit Verdatum (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 5,758 edits m →Blog analysis: typo ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:09, 3 December 2007 edit undo MortimerCat (talk \| contribs) 7,925 edits →Blog analysis: Keep Next edit →
Line 8: :<span style="color:Chocolate;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (<small>''[[User talk:Ceyockey\|talk to me]]''</small>) 18:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> * '''Delete''' If you're analyzing blogs, you'll call it blog analysis. That doesn't make it a term or a field of study. [[WP:N]] [[WP:RS]]. This may very well become a common term in the future, but it doesn't appear to be ready for WP yet. -[[User:Verdatum\|Verdatum]] 21:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC) *'''Keep''' It is a term I have been seeing recently. The article needs a lot of work but it is a valid subject. [[User:MortimerCat\|MortimerCat]] 00:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blog analysis: Difference between revisions