Content deleted Content added
m +sig |
|||
Line 9:
:'''Split''': IMO, split existing JavaScript libraries out of [[list of web application frameworks]] due to their conceptual differences. Unlike server-side frameworks, they don't directly access databases, don't use static templates but rather build the UI dynamically, they rarely have a concept of session management and they have a completely different security model. The articles should probably link to each other in their lead section though. I've been thinking of splitting these before, but haven't made an effort to do anything about it. -- [[user:intgr|intgr]] <sup>[[user talk:intgr|#%@!]]</sup> 18:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
:'''Split''': Agree with points made by intgr. '''[[User:BBilge|Bilge]]''' <small><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User_talk:BBilge|T]][[Special:Contributions/BBilge|C]]]</small> 10:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
I agree, client side Javascript libraries are NOT web application frameworks and should not be in this section
- MT
|