Talk:Procedural programming: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:10, 26 October 2007

Revision as of 05:50, 6 December 2007

Line 112:

:Also, there is no proof, that I could find, that some of the programs listed were written using procedural programming.

:(Quake and Doom sources are widely available and written using C.) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.8.200.98|24.8.200.98]] ([[User talk:24.8.200.98|talk]]) 07:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

::I believe that this section ought to be removed as well. The list has little to do with procedural programming itself and is woefully incomplete, seeing as it should include pretty much every C program in existence. Perhaps notable instances of procedural programming should be added to prose sections where they add to the article, or a list of procedural languages used instead, but a list of programs written using procedural programming doesn't seem particularly useful or relevant. [[User:CapitalSasha|''C''apital''S''asha]] ~ <small>[[User talk:CapitalSasha|''t''alk]]</small> 05:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)