Revision as of 07:37, 7 December 2007 edit Durova (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 60,685 edits →Please replace references: spot on ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:06, 7 December 2007 edit undo Webgeek (talk \| contribs) 148 edits →Follow up Question Next edit →
Line 354: so, did webgeek get a ban/block also? or just the spam domains and spammy ip's? The resolution of that point is unclear to me. --[[User:Rocksanddirt\|Rocksanddirt]] ([[User talk:Rocksanddirt\|talk]]) 21:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC) :FYI, Webgeek has not even been blocked: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Webgeek BlockLog]. No opinion at this time as to whether he or she ''should'' be. --[[User:Ali'i\|Ali'i]] 21:27, 6 December 2007 (UTC) ::Hi, A little thing i would like to say and update you. I have no association with Vijay Technologies or any other websites (or even their advertising partners) directly or indirectly. I guess the firewalls at my work ___location aren't blocking their websites and hence i was able to access their news stories and update Wikipedia articles accordingly. AndhraNews.net is a decent site from what i know since it is in existence for a long time (over 5 years now?) and are carrying news stories from various media outlets (ANI being one of them). Further they seem to have multiple advertising partners (apart from AdSense). I do not see the site to be designed with an intention to spam or so called Made-For-AdSense kinds considering they are giving a decent presentation since a long time now. Please do not mistake me that i am supporting this website but i am presenting my case about this whole thing. [[User:Webgeek\|Webgeek]] ([[User talk:Webgeek\|talk]])

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Webgeek: Difference between revisions