Dialectic process vs. dialogic process: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:46, 12 July 2007

Revision as of 18:21, 19 December 2007

Line 1:

In a [[dialectic]] process describing the interaction and resolution between multiple [[paradigms]] or [[ideologies]], one putative solution establishes primacy over the others. The goal of a dialectic process is to merge point and counterpoint (thesis and antithesis) into a compromise or other state of agreement (synthesis).

In a [[dialogic]] process, various approaches coexist and are comparatively [[existential]] and [[relativistic]] in their interaction. Here, each ideology can hold more salience in particular circumstances. Changes can be made within these ideologies if a strategy does not have the desired effect. Thus, these entities do not necessarily merge (or become subjugated) into bigger entities as in the dialectic process, but nonetheless modify themselves (sometimes fundamentally) over the course of mutual interaction.

These two distinctions are observed in studies of [[personal identity (philosophy)|personal identity]], [[national identity]] and [[group identity]].