Revision as of 02:40, 20 December 2007 edit Mikus (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 5,080 edits Removed reference to 2:3 pulldown as unrelated to the topic. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:42, 20 December 2007 edit undo Mikus (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 5,080 edits Removed reference to Cinealta camera as non-essential for the generic nature of the topic Next edit →
Line 8: Charles Poynton, an authority in digital television, makes the following remark in his book: "Proponents of [PsF] scheme claim compatibility with interlaced processing and recording equipment, a dubious objective in my view."<ref>{{cite web\|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=ra1lcAwgvq4C&pg=RA1-PA62&vq=segmented+frame&dq=segmented+frame&sig=8ZAl0RqzUYnyxQSmjxiIw4ZJDbE\|title=Charles Poynton, "Digital Video and HDTV: Algorithms and Interfaces"}}</ref> He does not question the usefulness of progressive segmented frame to deliver progressive material for the end users; just one paragraph above he explains the technique to transfer movies to video: "Film is transferred to 575i video using 2:2 pulldown: Each film frame is scanned into two video fields (or frames); the film is run 4% fast." ~~Sony's [[CineAlta]] series of cameras are capable of recording directly to 23.976PsF, 24PsF and 25PsF on HDCAM tape along with the interlaced versions of those signals.~~ ==References==

Progressive segmented frame: Difference between revisions