Revision as of 05:23, 1 January 2008 edit Kingdon (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 8,142 edits →Porkchop plot: seems to have been saved ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:20, 2 January 2008 edit undo Cosmo0 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 1,576 edits →Porkchop plot Next edit →
Line 11: '''Keep''', I've added a bit more. The plot seems to me of minor notability but high visual interest and a hook into orbital mechanics for laymen, so it's worth keeping even if it isn't central itself. --[[User:Dhartung\|Dhartung]] \| [[User talk:Dhartung\|Talk]] 22:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC) '''Keep'''. Recent edits make the article much more worthwhile than it was for the 2.5 years. (The sentiments about "Wikipedia is not finished" might also apply, but it is a moot point now). [[User:Kingdon\|Kingdon]] ([[User talk:Kingdon\|talk]]) 05:23, 1 January 2008 (UTC) *'''Keep'''. Even though it sounds like a neologism, the term seems to be well-established in the space exploration community. If someone wrote an article on [[Lambert's theorem]], I'd support merging this one into it, but the material needs to be kept. [[User:Cosmo0\|Cosmo0]] ([[User talk:Cosmo0\|talk]]) 22:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porkchop plot: Difference between revisions