Talk:Toytoy's proposed policy for wiki closure: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:06, 26 July 2005

Revision as of 22:08, 26 July 2005

Line 565:

:: No, you erred again. In adding from all the arguments given by my partner, if you consider as valid the top edits from an absent user it's another proof of incosistence of your proposal. You argue that WP collaborated by one man or by a little group of users would be closed. So, if this user is absent more than 3 months ago, how would be able Catalan WP to achieve more than 15.000 articles the last mont? (near of 3.000 new articles in those 3 months of the absent user with top-edits). It isn't hopeless nor a lack of productivity.

:: In the other side, this user named Llull is one of the founders who started Catalan WP more or less one year ago, and since then there is more than 1000 users. Every language version of WP's has started this way with a little group of users who arewere doing a commendable effort and compromise to engage it out, including English version. And your arguments against little communities of wikipedians is also disappointing Jimbo Wale's statements about this subject: In an interview on Spanish newspaper (http://www.elpais.es) he said: "More than 50% of edits in english is done by 524 active users, it means 0'7% of editors. WP in Spanish has 450 editors, but 8'1% of it is responsible of more than 90% of these articles."[http://www.elpais.es/articulo.html?d_date=&xref=20050714elpcibenr_3&type=Tes&anchor=elpcibred] Such as all we doing already here, excepting you, erred man, in any part of this interview he's neither considering that a WP ruled by little group of users as negative.

:: Your proposal is non the [[CPOV]], as all we're disappointing with you. As it's clear about the inconsistency of your arguments, I vote to close this debate and to modify the page in order to gathering the points of views expressed by all the users here. --[[User:Martorell|Joanot]] 22:04, 26 July 2005 (UTC)