Talk:JavaBeans: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Sithy (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Sithy (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 37:
 
:Java Beans *are* POJOs, with a standard naming convention. As for the ''why'', it's so you can have a "resuable component that can be manipulated visually in a builder tool." Do you need elaboration on why someone would want a reusable component? How about elaboration on why someone would want to manipulate it visually in a builder tool? You're complaining about something being missing from the article when *it's not*. If you expected something more out of JavaBeans, I'm sorry, there just isn't that much to them. [[User:Capnmidnight|capnmidnight]] 22:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 
::"[JavaBeans] are used to encapsulate many objects into a single object (the bean), so that the bean can be passed around rather than the individual objects.". Isn't that concept infinitely recursive ? i.e. What comes before the bean ? What comes after ? As a newcommer to JavaBeans a definately agree there is lack of context in this article. --[[User:Sithy|Guillaume]] ([[User talk:Sithy|talk]]) 13:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 
== Serializable classes ==
 
Should serializable classes have a line like "private static final long serialVersionUID = 7526471155622776147L;"
I think I read that the serialVersionUID should be declared for serializable classes. Is this different for beans? Just a thought.
hi <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/203.197.25.11|203.197.25.11]] ([[User talk:203.197.25.11|talk]]) 12:01, 6 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
== Reusability ==
 
:What about a JavaBean makes it any more reusable than any other class or class hierarchy? A naive reader might think that all classes can be manipulated in a builder tool, so the article should say what the limitations of a non-bean might be. If merely adhering to the conventions makes it reusable - then please say so - and mention the use cases where it is more reusable than any other class. Might also help to say whether [[Enterprise JavaBeans]] are a subset of JavaBeans. --[[User:Hro%C3%B0ulf|Hroðulf]] (or Hrothulf) ([[User talk:Hro%C3%B0ulf|Talk]]) 08:48, 4 October 2007 (UTC) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Hroðulf|Hroðulf]] ([[User talk:Hroðulf|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Hroðulf|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->