Content deleted Content added
m reply |
Guy Harris (talk | contribs) Windows 95/98 weren't "applications", they were OSes. They supported not only Win16 apps but also Win32 apps. The Mac supported 32-bit apps. |
||
Line 4:
[[User:Gerbrant|Shinobu]] 21:11, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:I agree. I dislike it. It sounds like corporatese. Changing to "in which" here is enough to fix it. --[[User:Shlomital|Shlomital]] 12:52, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
==32-bit applications for Windows 95/98==
Windows 95 and Windows 98 weren't "applications", they were operating systems with a mix of 16-bit and 32-bit code. They supported both 16-bit (DOS and Win16) and 32-bit (Win32) applications. [[User:Guy Harris|Guy Harris]] ([[User talk:Guy Harris|talk]]) 19:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
==32-bit applications for Mac OS==
Mac OS supported applications with at least 24-bit pointers, and later versions supported applications with 32-bit pointers; the 68000 and all later 68k processors, and the PowerPC processors, supported 32-bit arithmetic as well, so the apps for the Mac weren't 16-bit apps. [[User:Guy Harris|Guy Harris]] ([[User talk:Guy Harris|talk]]) 19:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
| |||