Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melody (porn star): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
attribution |
Vegaswikian (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 11:
*'''Delete''' Just a worker, not a star. 01:56, 11 July 2005 (UTC) ''{{user|CalJW}} forgot to sign''
*'''Delete''' I have no objection to porn star biography articles, but there just isn't enough here. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 02:43, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' and '''Rename''' Having 62 films over 7 years shows staying power. She is also listed in the IMDb database, which is frequently used to establish the validity of claims about being an actress. The type of films don't matter if they are in IMDb, do they? If it was POV then it should have been tagged as such and not brought over to VfD. Giving the article the wrong name is also not a reason to bring it to VfD. Her filmography is more extensive then many other porn actresses. The difference here is that her article is still a stub. [[User:Vegaswikian|Vegaswikian]] 07:52, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
| |||