:* Does [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Introduction_to_evolution&diff=prev&oldid=187279621 this] solve that? [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
::*Yes. --[[User:Amaltheus|Amaltheus]] ([[User talk:Amaltheus|talk]]) 20:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
:::* TheeThe structure of DNA is referred to as the double helix. -- I do not think the author of this sentence intended to imply that helical shape was exclusive or even the primary force behind heredity. I didn't read it that way. It is a commonly used descriptive term for DNA. If it should become a major point of contention; then I suggest dropping "double helix structure" and just say'' they described the structure of DNA''; rather than increasing complexity in that passage. Going into the base pairing rules might be a tad off topic; perhaps best linked out. Would simply deleting the statement double helix structure achieve the same goal without the need to swing toward increased complexity? --[[User:Random Replicator|Random Replicator]] ([[User talk:Random Replicator|talk]]) 21:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
