Talk:Introduction to evolution: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 291:
 
:I was thinking that perhaps by removing the term "double helix" structure we could satisfy your concern with out the need to expand to a thesis on DNA. A mini-lesson on DNA base pairing seems a bit of overkill here. --[[User:Random Replicator|Random Replicator]] ([[User talk:Random Replicator|talk]]) 22:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 
I'm leaning toward the third in that it does not place too much emphasis of the helical nature. The current modification (2nd one) generates a a lot of information. I'm not so sure if all that extra data is to explain the sentence or to clarify our topic on evolution. I'll leave it as is and wait some feedback. Sorry if I'm nit-noding the thing to death.--[[User:Random Replicator|Random Replicator]] ([[User talk:Random Replicator|talk]]) 22:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)