Content deleted Content added
Ham Pastrami (talk | contribs) |
Ham Pastrami (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 130:
The Eclipse Foundation is a not-for-profit organization like the Apache Foundation. The staff employed by the foundation do not write the code for the plug-ins and frameworks that are available from eclipse.org. I don't think it's proper to credit them as being the "Developers" of the various IDEs that are built on top of Eclipse. Is there some proper way to credit the "Community"? --[[User:Rcjsuen|Remy Suen]] ([[User talk:Rcjsuen|talk]]) 22:29, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
:A valid point, but one of semantics. You're right that, for example, the authors of CDT might not be EF employees, but at the same time, we aren't claiming that CDT is an IDE; rather, it is an extension by which '''Eclipse''' is a C/C++ IDE. This could be another good reason to remove the field entirely from this article, as discussed above. [[User:Ham Pastrami|Ham Pastrami]] ([[User talk:Ham Pastrami|talk]]) 21:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
== ReportLab is not an IDE ==
| |||