Talk:Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
deprod |
|||
Line 1:
The description of how this protocol actually works is woefully wrong, and seems to consist mostly of the Cisco marketing blather about how good it is. It is '''not''' in any way a link-state protocol, and does not have a complete topology map (even though the documentation speaks of "Topology Table" - which is basically just a copy of each neighbour's routing table). I did find one Cisco document that's reasonably technically accurate, and will reference it in the article. Are there actually any public-___domain specifications of the protocol that we can reference? I found one thing that's pretty reasonable, will add that too. [[User:Jnc|Noel]] [[User_talk:Jnc|(talk)]] 17:55, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Line 69 ⟶ 68:
The information presented gives the reader enough depth into EIGRP to get started. Router sims cisco publications, and good old hands on experience will fill in the rest of the blanks for practical usage.
From Todd Lammle, Sybex CCNA Author:
The EIGRP protocol will run IPv6, but will run as a separate protocol.
== EIGRP 'Hybrid' Class ==
| |||