Content deleted Content added
Line 124:
Isn't the inverse of y = e<sup>x</sup> y = ln(x) and not x = ln(y)? -beasty401
:If, by any chance you are still looking at this page: both are valid. x = ln(y) describes the exact same ''relationship'' as y = e<sup>x</sup>, though, whereas y = ln(x) describes the inverse relationship (x and y swapped). When working with inverses, you may swap the x and y at the beginning, or you may swap them at the end. Either way works. Not ever swapping them works too, depending on your goal. --[[Special:Contributions/69.91.95.139|69.91.95.139]] ([[User talk:69.91.95.139|talk]]) 03:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
| |||