Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satisfaction with Life Index: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ultramarine (talk | contribs) →Satisfaction with Life Index: corrected |
Ultramarine (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 42:
Ultramarine: I still haven't seen any info regarding the demographics or specifics of the people questioned, meaning in my opinion, the list is still useless. I will admit however that I hadn't realized the entire basis of the SWLI was directly extracted from the more reliable/scientific "happy planet index", thus I'll push the issue no further and let others decide.
:Again, look in the surveys, references are given in the link above.[[User:Ultramarine|Ultramarine]] ([[User talk:Ultramarine|talk]]) 14:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
[[User:Sbw01f|Sbw01f]] ([[User talk:Sbw01f|talk]]) 01:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a scientific journal. We shouldn't care what methodology they used or how accurate it is (or isn't); we should care about whether it is notable and sourced. It is. The fact is, this survey exists and gained significant media attention, and thus can be covered, even if the science behind it is suspect. But at any rate, this is basically just using the data from one study (the [[Happy Planet Index]]) and using it to answer a different question. The data-gathering methodology in question thus belongs to another article anyway, and thus has no bearing on this one. --[[User:Ig8887|Ig8887]] ([[User talk:Ig8887|talk]]) 06:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
| |||