Revision as of 19:02, 26 April 2005 edit 62.176.30.2 (talk) info		Revision as of 15:37, 19 July 2005 edit undo Moly (talk \| contribs) 172 edits *roff as a markup language Next edit →
Line 1: I think DocBook does not have presentational markup. Not more than XHTML does. There are tags <code><emphasis></code> and <code><emphasis role="strong"></code>, but that's just as much as <code><em></code> and <code><strong></code> in XHTML. [[User:62.176.30.2\|62.176.30.2]] 19:02, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) == *roff as a markup language == What about '''roff''', '''troff''', '''nroff''', '''groff''', etc.? Where do they fit in in this scheme?

Talk:Comparison of document markup languages: Difference between revisions