Wikipedia:Template locations: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Rebuttal: rm an rebuttal to an argument that noone has made |
|||
Line 46:
*Templates ''do'' have priviledged status above other talk/meta data. In service as signposts, they must be placed in the most visible locations available.
**This is something to explore more. If we want to blur the concept of articles and talk a bit by having signposts then that might be more acceptable than the current situation. Maybe a signpost could go at the bottom of the article. "Open issues being discussed at the talk page... POV, Missing Data"?
*Accusing editors of using templates as "decoration" violates "assume good faith". If you see templates being used as "decoration", [[WP:BOLD|be bold]] and fix the problem.
*Most information for editors is equally valuable for readers.
**So you agree that at least some of the information should be moved to the talk page?
==Notes==
| |||