Content deleted Content added
m moved Talk:WIMP to Talk:Weakly interacting massive particles: The long name is better than the acronym |
suggestions |
||
Line 76:
There is no mention of who coined the term or postulated their existence, or when they may have done so. -[[User:Ravedave|Ravedave]] 05:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
==suggestions==
This article needs some attention from an expert. It focuses only on detection, and doesn't do an adequate job of discussing theoretical or observational reasons for expecting that WIMPs might exist. The following sentence doesn't make sense: "Although predicted scattering rates for WIMPs from nuclei are significant for large detector target masses,prediction that halo WIMPs may, as they pass through the Sun, interact with solar protons and helium nuclei." There is no real discussion of their possible particle-theoretical properties. Are they assumed to be fermions? If so, why? Are they their own antiparticles? Are they expected to come in families? The article refers to supersymmetry. Do WIMPS exist generically in all supersymmetric models? What kind of bosons would their supersymmetic partners be?--[[Special:Contributions/76.93.42.50|76.93.42.50]] ([[User talk:76.93.42.50|talk]]) 03:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
| |||