Revision as of 01:33, 22 February 2008 edit Shawn à Montréal (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 158,733 edits delete ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:30, 22 February 2008 edit undo Wikidemon (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 36,531 edits →Mar-Kov Computer Systems: delete Next edit →
Line 18: <small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computers\|list of Computers-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Shawn in Montreal\|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal\|talk]]) 01:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)</small> '''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Shawn in Montreal\|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal\|talk]]) 01:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - couldn't see any notability here. The fairness argument that a company should be included if its competitors are has appeal but I don't agree. We're here to foster knowledge in the world, not to create a marketplace. There's a close cousin to that argument that does work...if we cover 90% of a subject we ought to cover the other 10% because otherwise the gap is unencyclopedic. It really depends on the nature and shape of a business. If there is a small number of companies in a field, and if the field is such that really understanding the field requires us to know each of the competitors, it makes sense to describe them all one way or another. If there are an indefinite number, or if a complete list isn't really essential, no reason to do it just out of fairness.[[User:Wikidemo\|Wikidemo]] ([[User talk:Wikidemo\|talk]]) 15:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mar-Kov Computer Systems: Difference between revisions