Wikipedia:The Problem with Projects: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:59, 24 February 2008

Revision as of 21:03, 24 February 2008

Line 42:

I would welcome any responses. Also, I know my writing is at times at least borderline incoherent. If there are any questions regarding what it is I am attempting to say in the above, please indicate as much and I will at least try to clarify.

==Responses==

==Response from editors==

Please place all comments regarding this page, and proposed changes to this page, on the talk page. Thank you.

:''Responses are welcome. The opening statement may need improvement. If there are any questions regarding the above, please indicate as much and editors will try to clarify''.

'''Sign all comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>'''

*This is basically an opening attempt to organize all Wikiprojects. The points need not be belabored. This has already been done ''de facto'' by/at [[:Category:WikiProjects]] and there is no need to reinvent the wheel. From experience, Wikiprojects that are dormant or inactive for about a year are tagged as such with the {{tl|historical}} template and categorized at [[:Category:Inactive WikiProjects]]. Deleting Wikiprojects entirely is too radical and flies in the face of [[WP:NOT#PAPER]] as well, as are many of the concerns above. [[User:IZAK|IZAK]] ([[User talk:IZAK|talk]]) 18:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)