Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Saintjust: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Caspian blue (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Caspian blue (talk | contribs) m + |
||
Line 119:
* Similar edit summary
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Good_friend100&diff=169166834&oldid=169166710 self rv; whatever by LactoseTI], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Heimstern&diff=prev&oldid=174777483 reverting myself. never mind --Saintjust]
* adverb or adjective + because
Line 137 ⟶ 135:
5. [[Talk:Dokdo/Archive_9]] Most sources outside of Korea use both names in their articles. However, since Koreans seem to care about this issue much more than the Japanese, Korean sources have printed a lot of material that uses only the name "Dokdo." You're right that most English language sources use "Dokdo" than they do "Takeshima," but that's '''only because''' pro-Korean sources print more things about this issue. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by {{user|121.1.175.13}}(talk) 04:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC).
6. I have removed a chunk of the worst POV statements. '''Mainly because''' the English didn't make any sense. (Felt that the Rusk article was Japanese POV, feel that the name of this article is Korean POV). by Macgruder 09:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
7. "But we know that Korea had longer control of Liancourt Rocks right". '''Not necessarily because''' the history and maps are unclear, so no we don't know that. Besides it's off topic. It's not for us to interpret the history. It's for Wikipedia to report what historians including Japanese and Korean say. Macgruder 03:57, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
[[WP:OP]] result is not confirmed yet, however When I included Komdori and LactoseTI in KoreanShoriSenyou case, they're not excluded like Endroit who lives in USA. It is possible that Komdori or other suspected people used [[open proxy]], or [[TOR]].
| |||