Revision as of 21:29, 24 February 2008 edit John Carter (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 176,670 edits →Types and Grades of projects: added a little ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:53, 27 February 2008 edit undo The Duke of Waltham (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 10,682 edits m →Banner placement: Typo Next edit →
Line 39: ==Banner placement== Possibly one of the most contentious issues out there is banner placement. If this model were to be observed, we would, perhaps, effectively limit ourselves regarding most articles to only ~~the~~ the three types of projects above. While that might not limit the number of banners as much as some would like, I can and do see that there may well be a degree of consolidation in that regard as well, and am to a degree trying to help implement a few such changes myself. By following this model, and perhaps encouraging inactive projects to either merge into one of the projects from the three main areas above or being deleted if their pages provide no particular useful information for the future, we would help ensure that the article talk pages don't become too overburdened with banners, while at the same time not being too "warlike" and "dictatorial" regarding what would and would not qualify as a project. ▼ ~~Possibly one of the most contentious issues out there is banner placement. If this model were to be observed, we would,~~ ▲perhaps, effectively limit ourselves regarding most articles to only the the three types of projects above. While that might not limit the number of banners as much as some would like, I can and do see that there may well be a degree of consolidation in that regard as well, and am to a degree trying to help implement a few such changes myself. By following this model, and perhaps encouraging inactive projects to either merge into one of the projects from the three main areas above or being deleted if their pages provide no particular useful information for the future, we would help ensure that the article talk pages don't become too overburdened with banners, while at the same time not being too "warlike" and "dictatorial" regarding what would and would not qualify as a project. I would welcome any responses. Also, I know my writing is at times at least borderline incoherent. If there are any questions regarding what it is I am attempting to say in the above, please indicate as much and I will at least try to clarify.

Wikipedia:The Problem with Projects: Difference between revisions