Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fawm: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Close as no consensus |
|||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''no consensus'''. I am giving this the benefit of doubt for now. It has developed. Let us see whether it develops further. [[User:Bduke|Bduke]] ([[User talk:Bduke|talk]]) 08:30, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
===[[Fawm]]===
:{{la|Fawm}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Fawm|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fawm]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fawm|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 February 20#{{anchorencode:Fawm}}|View log]])</noinclude>
Line 22 ⟶ 28:
*** '''Comment''' Blogs are not considered to be reliable sources because there is no editorial control, people can say what they want regardless if it's true whereas content in Wikipedia needs to me [[WP:V|verifiable]] from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. I'm sure you're here in good faith but it's important to understand Wiki guidelines regarding articles. This article may be kept, we don't know yet. <small>'''TRAVELLINGCARI'''</small>'''<sup>[[User:Travellingcari|My story]]</sup>'''<sub>[[User talk:Travellingcari|Tell me yours]]</sub> 15:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
** How long do I have to provide a source? BBC Radio York plan to do a piece on FAWM on monday morning. Thanks. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Kesstrel|Kesstrel]] ([[User talk:Kesstrel|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kesstrel|contribs]]) 14:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
|