Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Geometry guy (talk | contribs) m Bypass redirect |
Geometry guy (talk | contribs) →Process: Copyedit, and remove references to bold delisting, per talk page discussion (sorry to take so long to get round to this) |
||
Line 5:
==Process==
For this initial sweep, ''all'' Good articles listed need to be reviewed against all [[WP:WIAGA|GA criteria]]. Because
#Choose a sub-category on the [[WP:GAPQ/SL|sweeps list]].
#Tag the subcategory with {{tl|UnderReview}}.
#Review the articles against the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]] as you would an article listed at [[WP:GAN]] or [[WP:GAR]].
#*If an article
#**In the case of a clear failure to meet the criteria, remove the article from [[WP:GA]] and leave a message on the article talk page using {{tl|GASweepsDelist}} with a detailed list of issues below it. (If you update {{t1|articlehistory}}, please scroll to the bottom of the talk page to see if the red error category is lit when you finish.)
#*If the article is questionable or appears to fail, but you are not comfortable delisting it, nominate it for review at [[WP:GAR|Good article reassessment]].▼
#*
▲#*If
#*If the article passes review, update to the current oldid with an edit summary of <code>Updating oldid per [[[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force]]]]</code>.
#Once you've completed a subcategory, update the <code>Last article quality sweep</code> field on the sweep list with your signature.
Line 19 ⟶ 20:
====Pass====
<nowiki>==GA Sweeps
<nowiki>This article has been reviewed as part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force]]. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a [[WP:GA|Good article]]. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, ~~~~</nowiki>
====
<nowiki>==GA Sweeps
<nowiki>This article has been reviewed as part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force]] in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the [[WP:WIAGA|Good article criteria]]. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed. [Insert detailed list of issues here.] I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made and issues are being addressed, the article will remain listed as a [[WP:GA|Good article]]. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through [[WP:GAR]]). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at [[WP:GAN]]. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Regards, ~~~~</nowiki>
====[[WP:GAR]]====
<nowiki>==[[WP:GAR|Good Article Reassessment]]==</nowiki><br>
<nowiki>This article has been reviewed as part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force]]. I question
====
Use
==Participation==
|