Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Bypass redirect
Process: Copyedit, and remove references to bold delisting, per talk page discussion (sorry to take so long to get round to this)
Line 5:
 
==Process==
For this initial sweep, ''all'' Good articles listed need to be reviewed against all [[WP:WIAGA|GA criteria]]. Because everyday new GAGAs are listed every day, we will be using [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_articles&oldid=153815416 this stabilized version] as the establishedlist versionon wherewhich the Sweepssweep will be based on.
#Choose a sub-category on the [[WP:GAPQ/SL|sweeps list]].
#Tag the subcategory with {{tl|UnderReview}}.
#Review the articles against the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]] as you would an article listed at [[WP:GAN]] or [[WP:GAR]].
#*If an article ''clearly'' fails to meet the criteria—which will be the case for many articles promoted prior to the creation of criteria in 2006—[[WP:BOLD|boldly]] delist the article byin removingaccordance itwith fromthe [[WP:GA]] and leave a message on theGood article talk page using {{tlreassessment/guidelines#delist|GASweepsDelist}}delisting with a detailed list of issues below itguidelines]]. It (Ifis youpolite updateto {{t1|articlehistory}},first pleasenotify scrollarticle to the bottomeditors of theyour talkintentions pageand togive seethem ifa thechance redto errorrespond category(a isday litshould whenbe you finish.enough).
#**In the case of a clear failure to meet the criteria, remove the article from [[WP:GA]] and leave a message on the article talk page using {{tl|GASweepsDelist}} with a detailed list of issues below it. (If you update {{t1|articlehistory}}, please scroll to the bottom of the talk page to see if the red error category is lit when you finish.)
#*If the article is questionable or appears to fail, but you are not comfortable delisting it, nominate it for review at [[WP:GAR|Good article reassessment]].
#*Minor*In the case of minor issues, issues which can easily be easily addressed, shouldtry eitherto befix listedas onmany theproblems articleas talkyou pagecan, orlist boldlyany correctedremaining duringissues youron review.the talk page, then Giveallow editors seven days to address issues.them, Beas sureyou to keep upwould with articles that are "put on hold" (soat toGAN speak,(but don't tag asthe article with an "on hold" template). Be sure to keep track of the article.
#*If theyou articleare isunsure questionablewhether orthe appearsarticle tomeets failthe criteria, butor you are not comfortable delisting it, nominate it for review at [[WP:GAR|Good article reassessment]].
#*If the article passes review, update to the current oldid with an edit summary of <code>Updating oldid per [[[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force]]]]</code>.
#Once you've completed a subcategory, update the <code>Last article quality sweep</code> field on the sweep list with your signature.
Line 19 ⟶ 20:
 
====Pass====
<nowiki>==GA Sweeps (Pass)==</nowiki><br>
<nowiki>This article has been reviewed as part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force]]. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a [[WP:GA|Good article]]. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, ~~~~</nowiki>
 
====OnSweeps hold====
<nowiki>==GA Sweeps (on hold)==</nowiki><br>
<nowiki>This article has been reviewed as part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force]] in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the [[WP:WIAGA|Good article criteria]]. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed. [Insert detailed list of issues here.] I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made and issues are being addressed, the article will remain listed as a [[WP:GA|Good article]]. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through [[WP:GAR]]). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at [[WP:GAN]]. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Regards, ~~~~</nowiki>
 
====[[WP:GAR]]====
<nowiki>==[[WP:GAR|Good Article Reassessment]]==</nowiki><br>
<nowiki>This article has been reviewed as part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force]]. I question the quality ofwhether this article based onmeets the [[WP:WIAGA|Good article criteria]]. For that reason, I have listed the article at [[WP:GAR|Good article reassessment]]. Issues needing to be address are listed there. Regards, ~~~~</nowiki>
 
====[[WP:BOLD|Bold]] delistDelist====
Use [[:Template:GASweepsDelist|<nowiki>{{subst:tls|GASweepsDelist}}</nowiki>]] for these.
 
==Participation==