Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1:
What's the point of having so much detail about each miniseries? They don't even deserve a separate section each, when thinking about the big picture (the actual Crisis and such shenanigans). I'm not as versed in Crisislore as the guys who actually wrote the "summaries" (I am '''not''' reading the books), but I think it shouldn't be made such a big thing. My suggestion:
<blockquote>
Infinite Crisis
blah blah blah big event, blah blah blah DC Comics, bla blah blah 80's Crisis
Contents:
1. Countdown to Infinite Crisis: blah blah blah, special issue, blah blah blah miniseries blah blah corners of the DC Universe.
1.1 Miniseries 1
1.2 Miniseries 2
1.3 Miniseries 3
1.4 Miniseries 4
1.5 Other "tie-ins" and such (no ultimately complete issue listing, please)
2. (Actual) Crisis (nothing to be written about it yet, though, except maybe posting the available cover for issue #1, due October 2005)
3. Aftermath (can't see the future, nothing to write yet).
</blockquote>
It's a format suggestion. I'm not reading the books, so feel free to consider me unbiased or just plain ignorant of the article matter. Someone who knows better, please give this thing proper order. And make the article accesible for everyone.
[[User:Xjc|Xjc]] 02:34, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
----
I think the very existence of entries like this demonstrates what a joke wikipedia is. --[[User:Blue_Spider|Blue Spider]] 13:12, 14 July 2005
: Care to expand upon why you think this shouldn't be here? [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 17:32, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
|