Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by Brian Geppert - "→Red Hat delivers: new section" |
|||
Line 67:
Some of the language is in the past tense. This makes it sound like CORBA is no longer in use. [[Special:Contributions/194.72.110.12|194.72.110.12]] ([[User talk:194.72.110.12|talk]]) 11:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)jac
: Still in use, but it is not as ubiquitous as the vision. You can still find it in the Gnome desktop for Linux/Unix. [[User:SteveLoughran|SteveLoughran]] ([[User talk:SteveLoughran|talk]]) 18:39, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
: I had a reread of the criticisms section. 1. We need to mention Microsoft and their lack of support. If all of the vendors at the time embraced CORBA, it would have stood more of a chance. As it was, MS pushed COM/DCOM. The other issue is that the criticisms says that Java RMI is the way forward. But Web Services, built on WS-*, and HTTP-based REST services have changed that. Maybe the big limitation was not the competing technologies, but the emergence of the Internet itself. CORBA was built for LAN-based distributed computing, and you now have enterprise wide and internet-scale problems, for which alternate solutions are needed. It was HTTP that stopped CORBA. [[User:SteveLoughran|SteveLoughran]] ([[User talk:SteveLoughran|talk]]) 18:39, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
==NTCIP==
| |||