Revision as of 13:34, 23 December 2005 edit Extreme Unction (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,335 edits →[[Flex_programming_language]]: Closing debate. Result was "delete". ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:01, 18 March 2008 edit undo Van der Hoorn (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 5,658 edits m typo fix Next edit →
Line 11: '''Delete'''. Not notable, at least yet. They have over 2000 downloads but I found no mention of actual external use. Written by two people, used just in small company (alsoft isn't well known brand), no revolutionary features claimed. The article and Czech variant [http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flex] were created by one of language authors. Do not redirect to the parser as it is misleading. [[User:Pavel Vozenilek\|Pavel Vozenilek]] 23:00, 13 December 2005 (UTC) '''Delete.''' --[[User:Egg\|Egg]] <small>[[User talk:Egg\|✉]]</small> 01:06, 14 December 2005 (UTC) '''Redirect''' to [[Flex lexical analyzer]]. It is very rare for a proprietary computer language to have any real influence on the world at large; Visual Basic, Applescript, and similar OS or API-specific scripting languages are probably the only significant exceptions. (Consider [[~~Rebol~~REBOL]] -- it seems to be targeted at the same audience as Perl or Python, but it has no visibility to speak of, at least partly because it's proprietary.) [[User:Haikupoet\|Haikupoet]] 05:28, 14 December 2005 (UTC) '''Keep''' – This isn't well known language, but it has some interesting ideas and I have read some articles about them. I don't use it (it doesn't work on my platform and I prefer mainstream languages), but I don't agree that it is completely insignificant. --[[User:Petr.adamek\|Petr.adamek]] 10:22, 14 December 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete.''' Not notable. [[User:Tom.k\|Tom.k]] 10:46, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flex programming language: Difference between revisions