Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web based presentation tools: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m +and
No edit summary
Line 11:
*'''Keep''' as per JeremyMcCracken. the article brand new, so let's assume good faith and give the man some time to work before we start judging the article. constructive criticism or correcting mistakes yourself will improve things far more than "OMG! a policy violation! must delete immediately!". [[User:Grandmartin11|Grandmartin11]] ([[User talk:Grandmartin11|talk]]) 22:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
**Grandmartin11, I ask that you don't assume tone or intent and not read anything into my nomination other than what it states. Your comment implies an alarmist tone and approaches a personal attack. AfD is not a "must delete immediately" situation. There is a completely separate ''speedy delete'' process for that. AfD is a ''process'', not an automatic deletion. Dialog before decision is exactly why the AfD process is in place: to discuss the article's merits and drawbacks before a decision is made. ++[[User:Arx Fortis|Arx Fortis]] ([[User talk:Arx Fortis|talk]]) 00:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
***nominating an article for deletion not even an hour after it was created just seems rather alarmist to me (though i wasn't intending to imply this is an attack) and IMO, flies almost directly in the face of [[WP:GOODFAITH]]. [[User:Grandmartin11|Grandmartin11]] ([[User talk:Grandmartin11|talk]]) 15:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)