Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web based presentation tools: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Web based presentation tools: Delete |
Arx Fortis (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 12:
**Grandmartin11, I ask that you don't assume tone or intent and not read anything into my nomination other than what it states. Your comment implies an alarmist tone and approaches a personal attack. AfD is not a "must delete immediately" situation. There is a completely separate ''speedy delete'' process for that. AfD is a ''process'', not an automatic deletion. Dialog before decision is exactly why the AfD process is in place: to discuss the article's merits and drawbacks before a decision is made. ++[[User:Arx Fortis|Arx Fortis]] ([[User talk:Arx Fortis|talk]]) 00:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
***nominating an article for deletion not even an hour after it was created just seems rather alarmist to me (though i wasn't intending to imply this is an attack) and IMO, flies almost directly in the face of [[WP:GOODFAITH]]. [[User:Grandmartin11|Grandmartin11]] ([[User talk:Grandmartin11|talk]]) 15:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
****Regardless of the timing, the ''content'' warrants an AfD nomination per the two policy links I provided. The author is clearly building a page of external links (20+), rather than links to other Wikipedia pages. This is not so much a "work in progress", but rather a work going in a completely wrong direction. ++[[User:Arx Fortis|Arx Fortis]] ([[User talk:Arx Fortis|talk]]) 00:40, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Whether or not the nomination was premature, the article as it currently stands seems to be little more than a [[WP:NOT#LINK|link farm]] for a number of [[WP:WEB|non-notable]] [[WP:SPAM|commercial]] websites. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 15:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
| |||