Wikipedia talk:How to contribute to Wikipedia guidance: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Kim Bruning (talk | contribs) →Historical: some more historical |
Kim Bruning (talk | contribs) →Historical: some more missin |
||
Line 672:
I don't accept reverts without rationale, period. Provide a rationale!
The reason I marked as historical is because the page is unmaintained and contained at least one totally hilarious piece of prescriptive content. There was 1 edit in 2008, and the rest was done in 2007.
It is basically a recreation of a page that had previously been argued to death (literally) when its proponents couldn't show that their methods worked.
Some of this page describes workable methods, but much does not, and the things that work have already been described elsewhere as well.
Previously
What I'm missing is the old page history. The talk page was moved, but the page history itself wasn't.
--[[User:Kim Bruning|Kim Bruning]] ([[User talk:Kim Bruning|talk]]) 22:06, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
|