Wikipedia talk:Template index/User talk namespace/Archive 8: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs)
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs)
Line 1,242:
:I like it (same problem) but I tried moving the TOC tag higher, before the first text paragraph, and think that even better. Otherwise it reads clumsy splitting the two paragraphs. I didn't save that version but would like it higher. Can the TOC be higher and off to the side so as not to stop the flow of the text? [[User:Shenme|Shenme]] ([[User talk:Shenme|talk]]) 05:30, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
::Done! [[User:Jobjörn|Jobjörn]] ([[User talk:Jobjörn|talk]]) 10:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
== Huggle ==
 
Wth does "huggle" mean?! [[User:Jobjörn|Jobjörn]] ([[User talk:Jobjörn|talk]]) 17:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 
:See also - [[WP:HUGGLE]]. It's software for dealing with Vandalism. [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 18:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 
::Right. Why does it have its own template? (Or rather, its own redirect to a template?) [[User:Jobjörn|Jobjörn]] ([[User talk:Jobjörn|talk]]) 18:11, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 
:::I don't know - I imagine it would be to highlight that the template was placed in a semi-automated fashion using the software. I can't really think of another reason, but someone else might know of one. [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Claims]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Evidence]] </small> 20:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 
::::Huggle uses its own warning messages. However, for these messages to be correctly identified by certain automated processes, such as [[User:ClueBot|ClueBot]], they have to contain a comment of the form <tt><nowiki><!-- Template:Uw-* --></nowiki></tt> with the <tt>*</tt> replaced by the warning type and level. Huggle therefore inserts such comments, but in doing so gives the impression that the warning messages exist as templates, which they do not. These supposed template names are redirected to roughly equivalent actual templates in case anyone actually tries to use them – [[User talk:Gurchzilla|Gurchzilla]] 18:35, 5 April 2008 (UTC)