Content deleted Content added
PowerCoder (talk | contribs) |
→Medcab: no hypotheticals. Criticism would need to be sourced and given due weight |
||
Line 676:
::Perhaps it should be further noted that this very page (PowerBASIC Discussion) includes at least 76 paragraphs, authored by Real World Experience, which contain fabricated, hostile slander directed towards PowerBASIC. It's my understanding that Wikipedia policies require that discussion pages follow all the same rules as main articles, even if not quite to the same degree. It's becoming increasingly clear that he's using this page, as well, to reach his "goals".[[User:PowerCoder|PowerCoder]] ([[User talk:PowerCoder|talk]]) 10:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
::Some here have noticed that Real World Experience may not be a newcomer with a sincere wish for mentoring. A quick review of his mentoring page reveals that he contributed 36 paragraphs of text communicating with his mentor. Of those 36 paragraphs, 27 paragraphs were either hostile towards PowerBASIC, or seeking help with better ways to push his point of view in the dispute process.[[User:PowerCoder|PowerCoder]] ([[User talk:PowerCoder|talk]]) 10:35, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
:::Let's not get dragged into hypotheticals. If he is new, he can be made a better editor :-D
:::I stand by what I'd originally said: "If something isn't in public view, it can't be sourced". Any criticism needs to be sourced, and would need to have due weight within the article. [[User:Xavexgoem|Xavexgoem]] ([[User talk:Xavexgoem|talk]]) 13:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
| |||