Revision as of 16:39, 4 March 2008 edit Five Years (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 26,544 edits edu ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:25, 29 April 2008 edit undo 66.31.47.44 (talk) POV comment Next edit →
Line 8: This article seems to be anti-block scheduling. There is very little support for block scheduling. Under "Effectiveness" there is no support for block scheduling. There should be both sides under this, probably split in two sub-sections, one fro pros and one for cons. [[User:Holycow958\|Holycow958]] 21:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC) :It does need two sides...(but block schedules suck anyways ;)) --<font color="green" face="Berling Antiqua">hello, i'm a [[User:Member\|<font color="orange">member</font>]]</font> \| [[User talk:Member\|<font color="grey">talk to me!</font>]] 23:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC) :I agree, it seems very one-sided, anti-block scheduling. ==Sections==

Talk:Block scheduling: Difference between revisions