Talk:Criticism of communist party rule/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:12, 14 August 2005

Revision as of 20:13, 14 August 2005

Line 638:

:::This is incorrect. I have incorporated many of your points in my version and as you have done in yours. However, we now see to have reached a deadlock where you simply refuse to correct obvious npov violations like mentioning continuing environmental problems in Russia while refusing to mention environmental improvements in Eastern Europe. See earlier discussion. Therefore, the importance of the two-version.

::No, you have not. Your version is absurdly biased, Ultramarine, and everyone but you seems to notice that. Your version is the wiki equivalent of a show trial. You intentionally reduce all pro-communist arguments to easily refuted straw men. Just listing all the NPOV violations in your version would take hours, and I sincerely doubt it would have any effect on you anyway. -- [[User:Mihnea Tudoreanu|Mihnea Tudoreanu]] 20:1213, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

:::Again, why are some of you refusing to update the two-version template to the latest version of the more critical version? Are you afraid to let others see the content and arguments? This criticsm does not include Mihnea Tudoreanu, who has also often been constructive in the above debate before the deadlock. [[User:Ultramarine|Ultramarine]] 20:05, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

==The difference==

There are two versions of this article at the present time: One is a collaboration, the other is Ultramarine's pet. The single largest difference between them is that the collaboration is the result of editing efforts by several users, including Ultramarine himself. He has brought several objections to the content of the collaboration version. Some of those objections have been resolved, others are still in discussion. On the other hand, Ultramarine's pet article is the work of no one but Ultramarine himself, and there are a multitude of objections that other users could bring to it - starting from the intro, which blatantly censors a piece of information that is present in the collaboration version. -- [[User:Mihnea Tudoreanu|Mihnea Tudoreanu]] 20:1213, 14 August 2005 (UTC)