Content deleted Content added
Line 1,511:
:The comparison with religious beliefs would not apply, because we are dealing with science, but the comparison with the [[Palestinians]] article shows how Wikipedia will basically handle it (detailing the controversy and the standings of the conclusions, problems with it, etc.). I agree it should not be included in [[Macedonia]]. [[User:Decius|Alex]] 05:13, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
::''Detailing the controversy and the standings of the conclusions, problems with it, etc.'' But, of course. --[[User:FlavrSavr|FlavrSavr]] 05:36, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
I_sterbinski, you are formally right when you are saying that Miskin's link does not refer to the Macedonian/Greek HLA Genes research, however it's the same Arnaiz-Villena geneticist and it's probable that he's using the same methods. So, I_sterbinski, I do beleive that you are actually wrong when you say that this research hasn't been disputed in the scientific community. '''It is indeed disputed'''. However, some Decius and Miskin, you have rushed in, because some parts of the scientific community actually support Arnaiz-Villena (''Note that I mentioned my personal POV about the issue''),and the links are to be found in the [[Palestinians]] article. An explicit support can be found here - [http://www.tufts.edu/~skrimsky/PDF/nature_genetics.PDF]. Also, note that the same Arnaiz Villena is not some clown in the scientific community, in fact he was a member of the editorial board of "Nature" until he was dismissed from the editorial board. --[[User:FlavrSavr|FlavrSavr]] 05:34, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
| |||