Wikipedia:Deletion review: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Digg]]: Change vote to Undelete |
→[[Digg]]: change to undel, but warn about current article |
||
Line 76:
***Why exactly was it unlocked by [[User:Thue|Thue]] then? "I just unprotected, as the website does seem to be getting notable." The fact is, that the site has become notable since the last VfD/VfUs took place, and the article that was deleted was not a recreation of existing content, but was a new article made after the page was unlocked by [[User:Thue|Thue]]. I see no reason to keep this article deleted. [[User:Psykus|Psykus]] 04:11, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
**Change vote to '''Undelete'''. Apparently not a recreation of previously-deleted content, so the previous VfDs and VfUs do not apply. Though I question the idea that a website could go from non-notable to notable in a few months, that's for a new VfD to decide, if it's warranted. <font color="green">[[User:Android79|android]]</font><font color="purple">[[User talk:Android79|79]]</font> 15:48, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
*<s>'''Keep deleted''' yet again. Note that the article at present still has its history; it needs deleting and recreating protected. -[[User:Splash|Splash]] 04:16, 16 August 2005 (UTC)</s>
*'''Undelete''', new article. But recommend it go to VfD shortly. And point out to the authors that the article as it stands needs deeply serious work. -[[User:Splash|Splash]] 16:19, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
*Wow. Three deletes and three failed VfUs. I suppose it is theoretically possible for this to go on ad infinitum. Sigh. '''KD'''.—[[User:Encephalon|<font color=#000>Encephalon</font>]] | [[User talk:Encephalon|<sup><font color=#000>ζ</font></sup>]] 04:18:54, 2005-08-16 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''. By way of fairness, Alexa gives [http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=&url=digg.com], which does suggest a rise in popularity at least. The 3 month average traffic rank is about 6200, but this week's average is 3855. Now, VfU still deals with process not content and the process was fine, ''but'' there is the question of protection aside from the speedy deletion. -[[User:Splash|Splash]] 04:52, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
| |||