Content deleted Content added
Line 152:
 
I noticed this discussion (I happened to have Antandrus's talk page in my watchlist). If you want another peer review of the article from an Internet-savvy expert, you might try Margaret Mikulska. But she really is an expert, so be prepared for a real criticism. Here's why: go into Google Groups and search "Mikulska Lutoslawski Wikipedia". Towards the end of her posting she refers to the article as it was before you started the major upgrade. Actually I wrote to her about 6 weeks ago asking what she now thought of it, but she didn't reply. You may get a response. [[User:DavidBrooks|David Brooks]] 22:13, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
:p.s. make sure her expectatations are set right. This is an general-audience encyclopedia, not a master's thesis. [[User:DavidBrooks|David Brooks]]