Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distributed Language: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Stationary (talk | contribs) |
Doug Weller (talk | contribs) →Distributed Language: delete |
||
Line 12:
*'''Comment''' RHaworth - I don't think that calling distributed language "a novel approach" makes the article OR. It seems likely that many of the references are OR, but if that's not acceptable then I need to be pointed to some Wiki policies that I've failed to grok. That said, I'm not much of a linguist, either, and I find Nsk92's arguments about POV and incomprehensibility compelling. I agree with the "delete if no major fix is forthcoming" position. [[User:Stationary|Stationary]] ([[User talk:Stationary|talk]]) 15:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as per Nsk92. Notability is not an issue, but POV and the fact that it looks like something written for the conference this year and as it is isn't suitable (or salvageable, it would need almost a whole new article) means in my opinion it should be deleted. [[User:Dougweller|Doug Weller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 17:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
| |||