Content deleted Content added
→List of Popular Software?: Replied to comment |
|||
Line 124:
: The list should be removed. To me it looks like an advertisement for these particular software. I would much rather prefer to see the use of procedural programming in general being mentioned somewhere in the text. // [[User:Fulkkari|Fulkkari]] ([[User talk:Fulkkari|talk]]) 07:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
:: The list is suppose to give the reader some popular examples of programs written using procedural programming. Most of the software listed is available as open source. This way the reader can see some examples of programs written using the procedural programming style. Yes, this whole list is an advertisement for procedural programming! Yes, the reader can actually see some GOOD examples of procedural programs that have actually worked in the real world -despite some false reasonings by some in the OOP community that procedural programming leads to unproductive spaghetti code. --[[Special:Contributions/76.25.205.169|76.25.205.169]] ([[User talk:76.25.205.169|talk]]) 21:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
| |||