Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distributed Language: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 20:
I'm the person who posted Distributed Language, and I did that because I believe it a very important concept. Of course, I'm an iexperienced wiki-user, and from the discussion I see that the article ought to be rewritten. I'd like to leave a stub, but don't know how to do it. Could someone advise on that, please? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sashakr|Sashakr]] ([[User talk:Sashakr|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sashakr|contribs]]) 23:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Hi! As a linguist, I find the distributed approach to be a very important development in linguistics. Surely, there are as always the usual pros and cons, but the number of papers, articles, conferences (and even a special issue of Language Sciences, Sep. 2007) clearly indicate that this is an important topic in linguistics, and therefore there is no doubt that this article should not be deleted. Whether it is written in a Wiki format or not, well, perhaps it isn't. On the other hand, there are some valuable information in the present version that might make it easier for another contributor to re-write the article. So perhaps it could be left as it is now for a while, giving other contributors some time to re-write it thouroughly?I've used Wikipedia for a couple of years now, but I haven't engaged in writing or discussing articles before, so I'm not sure about the usual procedures etc. in this situation. [[User:SunWork|SunWork]] ([[User talk:SunWork|talk]]) 20:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
| |||