Revision as of 16:24, 19 August 2005 edit Cberlet (talk \| contribs) 11,487 edits constructive advice ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:27, 19 August 2005 edit undo Cberlet (talk \| contribs) 11,487 edits No, it is not balanced Next edit →
Line 611: Alright, is the main page tidy now? Can we remove dispute tags & move over to [[Significance of Venona]]? [[User:Nobs01\|nobs]] 03:44, 19 August 2005 (UTC) :No, it is not balanced. If there is any mention of significance, it should include quotes or summaries from both supporters and critics. Why is it considered acceptable to bias an article by excluding critics and then claiming it is NPOV? I simply do not understand this. It violates basic Wiki policy.--[[User:Cberlet\|Cberlet]] 16:27, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Venona project: Difference between revisions