Content deleted Content added
Why are they called 'vertical'? |
add feedback to existing comments |
||
Line 1:
The long list of bullets is ugly and difficult to read. A conversion to tabular format would be better. If no one's going to do it, I'll eventually get around to it. -[[User:Shoecream|Shoecream]] 01:28, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
I'll second that. This format is ok if you need a definition of a code, but if one is trying to figure out what code does "whatever" it is not the best format. At best, then, it is a laundry list of codes. I would suggest making it a "sortable table" with codes being one column, function (say "Cancel Call Waiting") being another and the detailed explanation in a "details & comments" column. Users could then sort based on either the first or second column depending on whether they are looking for a definition of a specific code or searching for a code to perform a specified function.[[User:Enquire|Enquire]] ([[User talk:Enquire|talk]]) 20:55, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
== Standard ==
Line 6 ⟶ 8:
Thanks, --[[User:Abdull|Abdull]] 13:38, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Good question. I think, at least, it applies to Canada and the USA. In some locations the same codes also work with a # after the number instead of a * before. For example, some telcos have (for example) "70#" equivalent to *70".[[User:Enquire|Enquire]] ([[User talk:Enquire|talk]]) 20:55, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
== Why are they called 'vertical'? ==
| |||