Revision as of 00:30, 3 February 2008 edit Mathrick (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,848 edits →Languages?: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:43, 28 May 2008 edit undo Argonel (talk \| contribs) 52 edits →Table footnotes: new section Next edit →
Line 38: What exactly is the Languages table supposed to show? Languages which have regexes builtin? Languages for which a regex library exists? Something else? As it stands today, it's completely meaningless. [[User:Mathrick\|mathrick]] ([[User talk:Mathrick\|talk]]) 00:30, 3 February 2008 (UTC) == Table footnotes == I found the footnotes on these tables to be nigh on useless. Why are they using refun? I can see using refun when there are only one or two notes, but not when there are 7. I was forced to compare the link names on the endnotes with the notes themselves to figure out which note I was interested in reading. [[User:Argonel\|Argonel]] ([[User talk:Argonel\|talk]]) 21:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Comparison of regular expression engines: Difference between revisions