Revision as of 17:30, 1 June 2008 edit Caulde (talk \| contribs) 21,354 edits →Grawp, May 17th: c, remove my clerknote, more an opinion. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:37, 1 June 2008 edit undo Nwwaew (talk \| contribs) Rollbackers 3,602 edits →Grawp, May 17th: - explanation Next edit →
Line 12: ::<small>([[WP:edit conflict\|edit conflict]] with [[user:Rudget\|Rudget]], hopefully this should answer his query :)</small> Case {{relisted}} to [[WP:requests for checkuser\|requests for checkuser]], appears to have been neglected at the time of filing. Not sure of the value of it being listed (all accounts are blocked as Grawp socks and tagged), but listing for CU attention regardless; the final call is not for the clerks to make. [[User:AGK\|<font color="#2A8B31">'''Anthøny'''</font>]] 17:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC) :::Okay. That makes sense. Thanks. [[User:Rudget\|<span style="color:#8B0000;font-weight:bold">Rudget</span>]] <small>([[User:Rudget/help\|Help]]?)</small> 17:30, 1 June 2008 (UTC) ::::The CheckUsers may be able to find sleeper accounts, as well as block underlying IP's, which usually include open proxies and Tor nodes. <font face="Trebuchet MS">[[User:Nwwaew\|Nwwaew]]<small> ([[User_Talk:Nwwaew\|Talk Page]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Nwwaew\|Contribs]]) ([[Special:Emailuser/Nwwaew\|E-mail me]])</small></font> 18:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC) <!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --><noinclude> <!--

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Grawp: Difference between revisions