Wikipedia:Requests for comment/How to present a case: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
#What users will and won't look at: 2 grammar/usage/style corrections (added 2 commas, replaced "get" with "become very" to correct awkward sentence) |
#Context: 1 syntax correction (added missing word); corrected awkward ending of sentence by adding the missing word "instead" |
||
Line 28:
==Context ==
Users do not read up on disputes that might reach RFC eventually. It is very unlikely that they know the history of the dispute going in — that someone is a known advocate of a point of view, that someone has a history of defending problem users, or that everybody who has ever dealt with a user recognizes them to be a complete lunatic. Point these things out to them. If you point to an edit that comes after a month of heated discussion, it may not make sense to someone who was not a part of that discussion.
Take care with evidence that requires context. If there is better evidence for the same point, use that instead. Otherwise, be ready to explain the context. Note that the more explanation a piece of evidence requires, the less likely anyone is to have time to pay attention to it.
==Expertise of the users==
| |||