Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argument from Time and Contingency: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Formatting fixes |
|||
Line 7:
*'''Delete''' as a probable copyright violation. The [http://www.blogger.com/terms.g Terms of Service] of that blog hosting site reads: {{cquote|You or a third party licensor, as appropriate, retain all patent, trademark and copyright to any Content you submit, post or display on or through Google services and you are responsible for protecting those rights, as appropriate." Therefore, the author retains copyright of that blog.}}
:Tagging it with a G12 a few moments from now. [[User:Alexius08|Alexius08]] [[User talk:Alexius08|is welcome to talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Alexius08|about his contributions]]. 13:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Whether or not this is a copyright problem - and I suspect it isn't really, because I suspect that it's been posted here by the blog writer or with that writer's permission - this still is redundant to [[cosmological argument]], which is what this version of that old chestnut seems to be a slightly modified version of. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 14:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
| |||