Content deleted Content added
Instantnood (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 43:
:I have added this notice to the article (above the {{tl|twoversions}} notice). — [[User:Instantnood|Insta]][[User_talk:Instantnood|ntnood]] 10:21, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
==Which version to be displayed==
I have explained [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_airports_in_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China&dir=prev&offset=20050725101000&limit=5&action=history] why the current version was chosen in the edit summaries before, that is, according to what the list was like and was intended for at the time of creation, prior to the disputes and point of view-pushing edits and renaming. The {{tl|twoversions}} tag states precisely the version displayed is not, and should not be seen as an endorsement of any of the two versions. Further, I've added a notice telling that the title is also disputed. Nevertheless, [[user:Huaiwei]] and [[user:SchmuckyTheCat]] has tried to swap to the other version [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_airports_in_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China&dir=prev&offset=20050827234500&limit=5&action=history]. I would like to request for <u>third party opinion </u>to decide on which version should be displayed, with acknowledgement of the political arrangements and situations, and adhere to [[Wikipedia:naming conventions (Chinese)#Political NPOV|Wikipedia:naming conventions (Chinese)]]. Third party opinion will also be requested if there's a similar disagreement over other articles on which version should be displayed. — [[User:Instantnood|Insta]][[User_talk:Instantnood|ntnood]] 10:04, August 28, 2005 (UTC) (modified 13:25, August 28, 2005 (UTC))
:From the above, are you expecting only third party opinion to have any say in this affair, while in the meantime, your version stays? You gave your reasons for keeping this version, but the reasons for keeping the alternative version has already been voiced out time and again. Restoring your version purely based on the fact that you gave your reasons is clearly not enough. I am restoring it to the other version until you can come up with a more valid means of demonstrating your disagreement with a verion others have developed.--[[User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 11:10, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
::To repeat, it is not "your [my] version". If you request me to come up with a "more valid means", please provide valid reasons too to justify your restoration to the other version. Thank you very much. It wouldn't help by continuing to claim returning to what the list was intended for to be an invalid reason, while assuming your reasons to be valid; and based on that assumption, edit according to your point of view. — [[User:Instantnood|Insta]][[User_talk:Instantnood|ntnood]] 11:40, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
| |||